Posts Categorized: Pythian
Hearing this week that Larry Ellison is thinking of acquiring and releasing its own version of Linux and seeing the ensuing media buzz reminded me of a different, but no simpler time: November 9, 1998. In fact, to say it reminded me is an understatement, I have a severe case of déja vu!
Have you ever wondered how fast you can commit ? No matter what you do, a true commit will take time. The time will be very small, but it will still be more then doing an in memory query of a lookup table. And worst of all, you will serialize at the entire instance on it. So I did a test on how fast you can commit with 1 session. This will be the absolute maximum you can achieve in commit performance.
Here’s a quick way to diagnose where the database is spending its time for a specific process/operation. This is very similar to what statspack is doing, except it’s targeted towards a specific process, and does include the time where the database waited for the application.
I am happy to present the very first post to my new group blog, where I will be inviting Pythian DBAs with interesting thoughts to contribute to prepare blogs of their own. My subject for this first posting: DBD::Oracle. Pythian is a big user of perl and DBD::Oracle internally, as our problem tracking groupware, Support Track, and our availability monitoring software, avail, are all written using the DBI to communicate with the underlying database.
Seah Hull at the Oracle Open Source blog interviewed me on the subject of Pythian taking on the stewardship of DBD::Oracle and even has a podcast of the interview available on his site.
Pythian News is now using WordPress to transform our Industry News section into a group blog of articles relevant to the DBA community at large. We hope this will allow readers from throughout the DBA industry to get involved and not only view our blogs, but also be able to contribute to the discussions.
In a move that’s sure to spark interest, Sun and Oracle have partnered up to sell “Database Packs”, essentially pre-configured Sun servers including a licensed and working Oracle database install. They are being targeted to the SMB and mid-range space.
BEA finally gave up on their multi-core pricing formula of charging a 25% premium for dual-core CPUs. Oracle is still holding out with their “every core is .75 CPUs and we’re rounding up” pricing model. Interestingly, The Register isn’t shy about coming right out and saying what most of us have been thinking for some time: “Oracle has become somewhat of a multicore pricing laughingstock”. Link to article.
When Oracle took over Peoplesoft earlier this year, there was much doom and gloom in PropleSoft’s home town of Pleasanton, California because Peoplesoft employed 3000 people out of the total population of around 60000. It turns out that the end result has not been all bad for Pleasanton, other high-tech companies are moving in, taking advantage of the highly skilled workforce that Oracle laid off in its quest for acquisition-related efficiency and the overall impact on the community of the merger has been mild at worst.
In a major move, Oracle has released a vastly enhanced version of OCFS to the open-source community as a significant new entrant in the fully open-sourced cluster file system arena. To our delight, they’ve actually chosen the GPL as the release license!
At ITJungle.com we noticed this interesting article informing us that EMC subsidiary VMWare will not charge a premium for multi-core CPUs, opting instead to keep its licensing charges on a “”per-socket basis””. In his article, Timothy Prickett Morgan concludes that VMWare has decided to “”make it up in volume, as the old saying goes, and this straightforward approach as well as the rapid adoption of virtualization technologies on servers (and probably soon on desktops and workstations) should make it a lot easier for VMware to sell its wares.””