<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL Server Procedure Cache: More Relief on the Way</title>
	<link>http://www.pythian.com/blogs/938/sql-server-procedure-cache-more-relief-on-the-way</link>
	<description>News and views from Pythian DBAs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Log Buffer #93: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/blogs/938/sql-server-procedure-cache-more-relief-on-the-way#comment-181487</link>
		<dc:creator>Log Buffer #93: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pythian.com/blogs/938/sql-server-procedure-cache-more-relief-on-the-way#comment-181487</guid>
		<description>[...] at Pythian, Adam Machanic says that more relief is on the way vis-a-vis lack of procedure cache control. &#8220;.&#160;.&#160;.&#160;I consider lack of procedure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] at Pythian, Adam Machanic says that more relief is on the way vis-a-vis lack of procedure cache control. &#8220;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;I consider lack of procedure [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
