<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL Server COMPILE Locking and Encryption Keys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pythian.com/news/1231/sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1231/sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys/</link>
	<description>News and views from Pythian DBAs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warner</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1231/sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys/#comment-380248</link>
		<dc:creator>Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1231/from-the-trenches-sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys#comment-380248</guid>
		<description>Hi Billy, yes I meant case as in the “AbCdefGH” type. The official KB suggests that if the case is different on the calling code compared to the actual object name then there is a possibility of a cache miss but I couldn&#039;t replicate this behavior.

This could be legacy information on the documentation and no longer the case as I could not confirm it on SQL 2005. To be on the safe side I suggest just choosing a standard and sticking to it so the different case scenario is not a possibility, specially if working on SQL 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Billy, yes I meant case as in the “AbCdefGH” type. The official KB suggests that if the case is different on the calling code compared to the actual object name then there is a possibility of a cache miss but I couldn&#8217;t replicate this behavior.</p>
<p>This could be legacy information on the documentation and no longer the case as I could not confirm it on SQL 2005. To be on the safe side I suggest just choosing a standard and sticking to it so the different case scenario is not a possibility, specially if working on SQL 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1231/sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys/#comment-380209</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1231/from-the-trenches-sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys#comment-380209</guid>
		<description>For the issue w/ the executing the procedure with a different case than what it was created as. You mentioned this wasn&#039;t in the KB but you stumbled across it in your own situation. It looks like you were about to explain it but left it out?

Also, are you talking about case such as &quot;AbCdefGH&quot; or a setting in SQL Server?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the issue w/ the executing the procedure with a different case than what it was created as. You mentioned this wasn&#8217;t in the KB but you stumbled across it in your own situation. It looks like you were about to explain it but left it out?</p>
<p>Also, are you talking about case such as &#8220;AbCdefGH&#8221; or a setting in SQL Server?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL Lion</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1231/sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys/#comment-364991</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Lion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1231/from-the-trenches-sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys#comment-364991</guid>
		<description>To get more information about Isolation levels in SQL Server including Locks and its impact on database in detail with examples, refer the below link:
http://www.sqllion.com/2009/07/transaction-isolation-levels-in-sql-server/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To get more information about Isolation levels in SQL Server including Locks and its impact on database in detail with examples, refer the below link:<br />
<a href="http://www.sqllion.com/2009/07/transaction-isolation-levels-in-sql-server/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sqllion.com/2009/07/transaction-isolation-levels-in-sql-server/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Pitkis</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1231/sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys/#comment-281522</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Pitkis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1231/from-the-trenches-sql-server-compile-locking-and-encryption-keys#comment-281522</guid>
		<description>Interesting and usefull</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and usefull</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

