<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Max VARCHAR Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pythian.com/news/1353/max-varchar-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1353/max-varchar-size/</link>
	<description>News and views from Pythian DBAs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtÃ­culos destacados, Noviembre de 2008 &#124; cambrico.net</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1353/max-varchar-size/#comment-309845</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtÃ­culos destacados, Noviembre de 2008 &#124; cambrico.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1353/max-varchar-size#comment-309845</guid>
		<description>[...] sobre el tamaÃ±o del VARCHAR, en pythian group (en [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sobre el tamaÃ±o del VARCHAR, en pythian group (en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjen Lentz</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1353/max-varchar-size/#comment-298172</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjen Lentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1353/max-varchar-size#comment-298172</guid>
		<description>...and then there&#039;s UTF8...

TEXT/BLOB types of course cause disk I/O when tmp tables are needed during query execution, so using longer VARCHARs can generally be a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and then there&#8217;s UTF8&#8230;</p>
<p>TEXT/BLOB types of course cause disk I/O when tmp tables are needed during query execution, so using longer VARCHARs can generally be a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Atwood</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1353/max-varchar-size/#comment-298170</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Atwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1353/max-varchar-size#comment-298170</guid>
		<description>The additional overhead you discovered is the null mask.  There will be one byte of null mask for every 8 potentially nullable columns.  Your test table has 8 or less nullable columns, so you got one byte.  If you have 24 columns that can have nulls, you would have 3 bytes. And so forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The additional overhead you discovered is the null mask.  There will be one byte of null mask for every 8 potentially nullable columns.  Your test table has 8 or less nullable columns, so you got one byte.  If you have 24 columns that can have nulls, you would have 3 bytes. And so forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

