<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SunFire T2000 servers are best suited for Oracle MiddleTier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pythian.com/news/1499/sunfire-t2000-servers-are-best-suited-for-oracle-middletier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1499/sunfire-t2000-servers-are-best-suited-for-oracle-middletier/</link>
	<description>News and views from Pythian DBAs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fawcett</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1499/sunfire-t2000-servers-are-best-suited-for-oracle-middletier/#comment-349155</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fawcett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1499/sunfire-t2000-servers-are-best-suited-for-oracle-middletier#comment-349155</guid>
		<description>CMT boxes are optimized for throughput and response time is less for some applications.  We generally find that customers are happy with OLTP style environments where transactions tend to have low response times.  If your transaction increases from 0.01 seconds to 0.03 seconds, who really cares when the SLA is for &lt; 1 second.

People generally stumble with the utilities like RMAN, import, index builds ect... There are lots of ways to address these types of issues.

I have a lot of information regarding Oracle running on CMT on my blog.  Also, there was a joint session with Oracle and myself at OOW 2008 which discussed Oracle running on CMT.

http://blogs.sun.com/glennf/tags/cmt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CMT boxes are optimized for throughput and response time is less for some applications.  We generally find that customers are happy with OLTP style environments where transactions tend to have low response times.  If your transaction increases from 0.01 seconds to 0.03 seconds, who really cares when the SLA is for &lt; 1 second.</p>
<p>People generally stumble with the utilities like RMAN, import, index builds ect&#8230; There are lots of ways to address these types of issues.</p>
<p>I have a lot of information regarding Oracle running on CMT on my blog.  Also, there was a joint session with Oracle and myself at OOW 2008 which discussed Oracle running on CMT.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/glennf/tags/cmt" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/glennf/tags/cmt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasu Balla</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1499/sunfire-t2000-servers-are-best-suited-for-oracle-middletier/#comment-347778</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasu Balla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1499/sunfire-t2000-servers-are-best-suited-for-oracle-middletier#comment-347778</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kim for posting your experience here
Vasu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kim for posting your experience here<br />
Vasu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Njeru</title>
		<link>http://www.pythian.com/news/1499/sunfire-t2000-servers-are-best-suited-for-oracle-middletier/#comment-344322</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Njeru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pythian.com/blogs/1499/sunfire-t2000-servers-are-best-suited-for-oracle-middletier#comment-344322</guid>
		<description>I couldnt agree more with this post.  While working for a certain Internet Company, I had the opportunity to lab test a loaner T2000 from Sun in the hopes that we could replace our database servers with these.  
Database performance results were disappointing to say the least and we ended canning the hardware migration project and going with commodity hardware..(read DELL)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldnt agree more with this post.  While working for a certain Internet Company, I had the opportunity to lab test a loaner T2000 from Sun in the hopes that we could replace our database servers with these.<br />
Database performance results were disappointing to say the least and we ended canning the hardware migration project and going with commodity hardware..(read DELL)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

